“The governor's agenda in many of the bills that have been passed in the last spring session and veto session now drive wedges between parents and their children," Illinois state Sen. Jil Tracy said. | Facebook
“The governor's agenda in many of the bills that have been passed in the last spring session and veto session now drive wedges between parents and their children," Illinois state Sen. Jil Tracy said. | Facebook
Veteran state Sen. Jil Tracy (R-Quincy) said she sees neither common sense nor consistency in Democrats' push to repeal Illinois' Parental Notification of Abortion Act.
Despite objections from Tracy and fellow Republicans, the House, with its Democratic majority on Oct. 27 gave final approval on a measure that would no longer require that parents or guardians of an under-18 child be notified when she seeks an abortion. The Illinois House vote of 62 to 51 is enough to send the law to Governor J.B. Pritzker's desk, ABC7 Chicago reported, but because it didn't get a 3/5 majority or 71 votes, the repealed law wouldn't go into effect until June 1, 2022.
Sen. Elgie Sims sponsored the bill in the Senate.
“Of all the human relationships, there's none stronger than a bond between a parent and a child, and certainly while it lasts an entire lifetime there is no better critical event in the minor years when that child needs nurturing and support and counseling from the parents,” Tracy said during an Oct. 26 news conference.
Tracy also questions Democrats' methods in advancing the measure in Springfield.
“As we said earlier, why do bills have to be dropped in the middle of veto session when they're not being properly vetted and even allowed time to read them and let the public know what's going on?” she asked.
The senator sees a glaring inconsistency in how the measure would treat minors in matters of health.
“Most parents had to write a note for any type of medication to be given to their child at school, even if it’s just an aspirin or Tylenol,” she added. “If we say take such care in situations like that, how can we justify doing away with parental notification of abortions? I’m not talking about authorization or consent. It is notification. It’s letting the parents know their child is going to be undergoing a major medical procedure so that the parents can be aware and help provide that child with a mental and physical health care that they desperately need in such a critical time.”
Tracy ticked off further inconsistencies during the news conference.
“For example, we vote on bills that have allowed the Cook County Public Guardian to extend the time a child is made a ward of DCFS so that they can continue under supervision until the age of 21 because again, we have been told, and I believe it's true, that the minors aren’t capable of these decisions even up to the age of 21,” she added. “Remember last year we extended the age of smoking to the age of 21 because that person who happens to be an adult doesn't have the proper maturity. So, doesn't it seem illogical that we would think that going under a major medical procedure such as an abortion shouldn't be given a chance to have the parents involved in that decision, or at least be notified that it's going to be happening?”
Following this week’s vote, Tracy said she was concerned that the governor’s leadership is harming Illinois residents.
“The governor's agenda in many of the bills that have been passed in the last spring session and veto session now drive wedges between parents and their children and their responsibilities and duties to nurture and take care of their children,” she said. “It's an attack on parental rights, and it's a constant theme of this administration, and it’s just one more example of the governor’s overreach into the lives and the homes of Illinois families.”